WATCH: MUSA KEKANA CLASHES WITH STATE OVER HOW POLICE ENTERED THROUGH GATE
Shocking Photographic Proof Triggers Explosive Clashing Inside High-Stakes Crime Scene Inquest

A high-tension courtroom confrontation erupted during the cross-examination of a key witness as physical crime scene photographs were produced to challenge sworn testimony regarding a breached security gate.
The proceedings began with the presentation of crime scene photo number 194, designed to orientate the court with the physical layout of the witness’s premises.
The witness examined the photograph and formally confirmed under oath that the image depicts the entrance to his property, showing a swimming pool positioned to the left alongside visible remnants of police tape hanging from the building structure.
Attention then turned to photo number 195 from exhibit F, which captured photo number 193 showing a light truck parked directly at the entrance of the property.
The witness confirmed the accuracy of the image, agreeing that the vehicle and the primary property entrance were clearly visible in the photograph.
Using a laser pointer to illuminate specific details for the court and the accused in the dock, the cross-examiner pointed toward the left portion of the image to highlight the primary entrance gate and additional strands of police tape.
The examiner directed the laser pointer further to the left side of the photograph to display the cordoned-off area surrounding the swimming pool.
During this demonstration, Mr. Matlala stretched his neck from inside the accused box to catch a direct view of the illuminated evidence.
The witness verified that the cordoned-off swimming pool area and the police tape shown inside the premises were correctly identified.
The court then shifted its focus to photo number 195, taken from the inside of the property, which exposed the full structure of the open gate.
The examiner identified two critical security features on the photograph, starting with the gate motor located in the bottom left corner of the frame.
The examiner directed the court’s attention toward the far right corner of the gate, pointing out a section of wire mesh.
The witness confirmed seeing the mesh, testifying that upon zooming in or taking a closer look, it is evident that the wire mesh had been pushed inward specifically to allow a human hand to fit through.
The examiner questioned the witness about the physical security mechanisms of the gate motor, establishing that the device was secured with a steel bracket.
The witness explained the mechanical operation of the bracket under oath, stating that if the steel bracket is not locked, a person simply pulls the seal out and it opens in less than a minute.
The examiner confronted the witness with the photograph, noting that the steel bracket had been neatly placed back directly over the gate motor.
The witness agreed with the visual detail in the photograph, testifying that the steel bracket was neatly put back by the police officer.
The examiner immediately launched a fierce accusation, putting it directly to the witness that his proposition about the gate being manually opened was false and that the photograph served as absolute proof that he was lying to the court.
The witness erupted in a passionate defense from the stand, rejecting the state’s characterization of his testimony.
“The state advocate from yesterday has been saying that I’m lying, I’m lying, while the police officers that came here as state witnesses sat in the witness box and lied”, the witness declared.
“But the state advocate did not tell them that they were lying”, the witness added.
“She keeps on telling me that I’m the one that’s lying”, the witness stated.
The examiner confirmed that the explosive response stood as the witness’s official answer on the record.
Following the explosive exchange, the examiner formally requested the court to admit the photograph into the official record as exhibit NN, following the previously admitted exhibit LL.
Copyright: MDNtv