BREAKING: JOE “FERRARI” CONFIRMS WHATSAPP COMMUNICATION WITH GENERAL MKHWANAZI
Shocking Twist as Inquiry Uncovers Secret WhatsApp Leaks and Sudden Legal Objections
The high-stakes commission of inquiry reached a critical juncture when a massive, unexpected evidence bundle threatened to derail proceedings during the reading of a supplementary statement.
The panel confronted Mr. Spuni, who took the stand to address an additional, overwhelming package of state evidence labeled CJC 452 to 494.
Serviced on his defense team at the absolute last minute, the sudden delivery of the massive document package triggered a fierce general reservation of rights from the witness.
Mr. Spuni formally registered a bitter complaint on the official record, emphasizing that the severe time constraints prevented his legal team from properly analyzing every single item thrown at them.
He adamantly refused to waive any legal protections, explicitly reserving his right to challenge the admissibility, authenticity, and overall integrity of every newly produced exhibit.
The tension in the chamber mounted as the testimony zeroed in on a highly sensitive annexure containing an affidavit from the honorable minister Kikwete.
Mr. Spuni formally recorded a strict reservation of rights regarding the affidavit, demanding an entirely complete and fully legible copy before offering a comprehensive response.
He flatly denied any inconsistencies between minister Kikwete‘s sworn statements and his own prior testimony delivered to the commission on August 28, 2026.
Addressing the bench, Mr. Mik stepped in to verify whether the defense had finally received a clear version of the document.
Mrs. Koffer clarified for the record that while the initial physical printouts provided to the legal team were illegible, a subsequent electronic copy resolved the formatting issues.
Mr. Spuni confirmed to the panel that he accepted the electronic version as fully legible, allowing the hearing to proceed.
Attention swiftly shifted to exhibit CJC 482 and an item listed as number 55, bringing the proceeding to a dead stop over severe constitutional privilege objections.
Exhibit CJC 482 featured official legal correspondence from law firm Chris Kunge Incorporated, dated September 17, 2025.
Item 55 contained a sensitive eight-page digital forensic extraction detailing private WhatsApp communications between an advocate named Mweti and Mr. Sindani.
Mr. Spuni refused to comment on the substance of the messages, declaring under oath that he had zero knowledge of the contents and asserting that the documents were strictly protected under legal professional privilege.
He warned the commission that admitting direct communications between attorneys and their clients violated fundamental common law protections along with Section 35.3.G of the Constitution.
Mr. Spuni pointed out that any correspondence involving Chris Kunge Incorporated acting on his or his associates’ behalf remained entirely off-limits to state investigators.
He argued that the WhatsApp logs involving advocate Mweti were independently shielded by advocate-client privilege attached to Mr. Sindani, demanding that the commission resolve the breach before relying on the extraction.
The chairperson intervened, firmly noting that Mr. Spuni had no standing to assert legal professional privilege over communications belonging entirely to third parties and their separate legal teams.
Mrs. Koffer acknowledged the bench’s ruling, agreeing to adjust the defense arguments accordingly while maintaining that the witness simply had no prior knowledge of advocate Mweti.
The inquiry then examined exhibit CJC 490, which presented a single, isolated WhatsApp screenshot between Mr. Spuni and Mr. Mandla Gcaba Senior.
A spelling error in the official heading was immediately corrected on the record, swapping a letter Q for a G after Mr. Mik pointed out the typo.
Mr. Spuni described Mr. Mandla Gcaba Senior as a prominent, highly respected figure within the South African transport and business sectors.
He swore under oath that all communications with Mr. Mandla Gcaba Senior occurred strictly within lawful, legitimate taxi industry affairs and community engagements.
Mr. Spuni voiced deep alarm over the state’s reliance on a single, isolated screenshot stripped of its surrounding conversation history, declaring it inherently unreliable as legal evidence.
He formally invoked his constitutional protection against self-incrimination under Section 35.3.J regarding any aspect of the messages that could impact ongoing criminal court proceedings against him.
The hearing reached a climax when state evidence leaders presented exhibit CJC 491, containing direct WhatsApp screenshots involving General Mwanazi, the acting national commissioner of police.
The bench questioned why General Mwanazi was referred to as the acting national commissioner, prompting Mrs. Koffer to confirm that he held the official post during the exact period under investigation.
Mr. Spuni testified that his communications with General Mwanazi were initiated and facilitated exclusively through Sergeant Gcosi.
He revealed under oath that the high-level communications occurred purely in the context of official KZN peace talks preparations and broad efforts to resolve ongoing taxi violence.
Mr. Spuni maintained that the single screenshot failed to prove an independent, ongoing personal relationship with the acting national commissioner outside of official conflict resolution.
He once again invoked Section 35.3.J of the Constitution, refusing to offer answers that might compromise his active criminal trial.
Addressing a vast wave of unaddressed items in the late evidence bundle, including CJC 467, 469, 471, and 477 through 494, Mr. Spuni cited the extreme lateness of the state’s disclosure, which arrived the evening before his filing deadline, as the reason for his silence.
He reserved all rights to supplement his statement once formal, specific questions are submitted by the state with reasonable time to respond.
Concluding his supplementary statement, Mr. Spuni reaffirmed his commitment to cooperating with the inquiry while invoking every protection guaranteed by the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa.
Before releasing the witness, the chairperson sought to clear up persistent media reports regarding Mr. Spuni‘s position in the transport sector following the departure of Ms. Siba.
The chairperson asked Mr. Spuni to clarify whether he had officially retired from leadership.
“My blood is a taxi industry,” Mr. Spuni declared passionately.
He confirmed that he never retired and remains the active President of the South African Local and Long-Distance Taxis and Buses Organization, while actively maintaining all of his private commercial business interests.
Copyright: MDNtv
