Adv. Chaskalson Grills Joe Sibanyoni Over Ramaphosa Photo At Madlanga Commission

Explosive Video Evidence Exposes High Stakes Demands and Shady Corporate Dealings Involving Top Government Figures

Video thumbnail

Sensational video evidence and photo documentation presented during official proceedings revealed intense direct engagements between high-profile representatives, the president, and Minister Mantashe.

Investigative details established that an official photograph showing the president, Minister Mantashe, security officer Mr. Moyana, and Sergeant Nkosi was transmitted on 19 January 2024.

The underlying confrontation took place during political electioneering visits to traditional and royal houses intended to uncover community problems.

Tensions erupted as critical video footage recorded on the exact same day in January 2024 was officially played during the hearing.

The dramatic recording captured direct, aggressive demands made face-to-face to the president and Minister Mantashe.

In the recorded footage, the speaker explicitly confronted the president, declaring that the government was being put under a test regarding its findings and announcements.

“There’s no need for us to go to the court and spend money to pay judges. You are here. What do you need as you go to KZN and restructure the KZN, simultaneous restructure this year?”, the speaker demanded in front of the president.

The recorded statement further demanded economic infrastructure and commercial involvement in former homeland regions, warning government leadership not to interfere.

“We are busy engaging with Putco to the space. Putco has been operating here for 43 years. Please assist us when we find someone wanting to interfere with the Putco business. You must know it’s us. Don’t put the red tape. Assist us as how do we get into the space?”, the speaker warned the president on camera.

The recorded confrontation explicitly referenced a relentless push for a 30 percent stake, issuing an explicit threat to march directly onto mining operations.

“We are fighting for our own 30% within the Putco section. It is that the 30% belong to the people of one, but when we’re talking to you, we don’t need any red. If they don’t follow that, we will fight for ourselves. There are mine, we’ll go and visit them. Don’t worry. Why you still restructuring government, it’s fine. We’ll go there to the mines. When you see people at the mines from Kwagga, it’s us. Don’t fight us. Just support us. What we need, deliver that”, the recorded statement declared.

Questioning during the hearing focused squarely on these aggressive demands made to the highest levels of government.

Under direct interrogation, it was disclosed that numerous private meetings took place with Mr. Pisapia, the CEO of Putco.

The purpose of these secret meetings was to secure a local content stake within Putco’s massive transport operations.

Evidence revealed that Putco was operating on a temporary month-to-month government contract at the time of the meetings.

Because the temporary contract could be cancelled at any moment, Mr. Pisapia requested intervention with top government officials to secure a permanent, long-term government contract.

It was established under oath that Putco offered to negotiate and grant the 30 percent local content stake only if assistance was provided to secure the long-term state contract.

Despite using the phrase “fighting for our own 30%” directly to the president and Minister Mantashe, the witness claimed under questioning that the term merely meant corporate engagements rather than physical conflict.

The planned business model did not involve purchasing direct equity shares in Putco itself.

Instead, the arrangement required Putco to enter into a subcontracting agreement, handing over buses, routes, and valuable supply chain business to a local entity.

The entity designated to receive the buses and run the lucrative subcontracted routes was identified as GCBS.

When pressed to identify the individuals behind GCBS, details emerged pointing to the local taxi industry and specific corporate directors.

When asked to name all individual directors profiting from the entity, the witness refused to name multiple figures, stating: “No, let’s stick to Mr. Perry“.

Adv. Chaskalson Grills Joe Sibanyoni Over Ramaphosa Photo At Madlanga Commission

Recommended for You

“It seemed like a simple rivalry, until everyone noticed the timing of her post. That’s when it became clear that the destruction was orchestrated…”

“It seemed like a simple rivalry, until everyone noticed the timing of the threats. That’s when it became clear that the destruction was orchestrated…”

“It seemed like a simple alliance, until everyone noticed the timing of the leak. That’s when it became clear that the destruction was orchestrated…”

“It seemed like a happy marriage, until everyone noticed the timing of the leaks. That’s when it became clear that the destruction was orchestrated…”

“It seemed like a simple alliance, until everyone noticed the timing of the leak. That’s when it became clear that the destruction was orchestrated…”

“It seemed like a simple mystery, until everyone noticed the timing of the reveal. That’s when it became clear that the destruction was orchestrated…”

“It seemed like a simple rivalry, until everyone noticed the timing of their meeting. That’s when it became clear that the destruction was orchestrated…”

“It seemed like a happy marriage, until everyone noticed the timing of Zipho’s response. That’s when it became clear that the end was orchestrated…”

“It seemed like a private falling out, until everyone noticed the timing of the release. That’s when it became clear that the destruction was orchestrated…”